it turns out all the shit dems and obama got for being weak on terroism and immigratio...they actully been pretty good
Terriost attack in generaly no matter the race doest happen that often
foreign mulsims attack is pretty fucking low.
Are vetting process seem to be good. Some say since it takes 1 to 2 years to get in here through the refuging process the vetting can be descibe to as EXTREME
Net immigration went down under him
Deportions went UP
He focused the deportian on people with violent crime. Which the plan trump now saying he going to do. So he doing obamas plan
if you want to bomb ISIS...he bomb them a lot. Some would describe as BOMBING THE SHIT out of them
If you complain about the dems and obama..it not that they to soft..it these ideas basicly republican like. But since for some reason the right cant attack them on that..they got to pretend he been liberal about it.
And again not like the news dont report on it when attacks happen. it just that it doesnt happen as often as people think. So sometime days it simply nothing to report. Which make me think they no amount of reportinf that would be enough
they could have the MUSLIM CRIME HOUR, every day and people be like "Why only an hour dedicated to it"
So the number that get's thrown around a lot is that Muslims' are 5000x percent over-represented but they are really only 1300x percent over-represented?
I dont know if they OVER represented. But they sure as shit not UNDER represented. It not like there a liberal agenda not to report on this like that big orange head man says
Interestingly enough one of the commenter's put this on it; don't know if legite but here you go:
"Faith.....Most of those 89 terrorist attacks were minor things. They count shit like vandalism by eco-terror and animal rights groups as terror. Nobody cares about THAT shit. What we care about is violent attacks on people, particularly ones with fatalities. Of the 145 deaths in the US due to terror attacks since 911, 95 were from Muslims. That comes out to 66% !!! 66% of the terror deaths in the US since 911 (if we want to convenienlty do the muslims a favor and skip over the 3000 dead from that little happening) done by less than 1% of the US population! That should be a very, very embarrassing number for Muslims and the Young Turks, who downplay Islamic terror every chance they get. The Young Turks are trying to muddy the waters by mixing in minor attacks against property with the ones that leave dead bodies."
"Ahhhh no, you don't understand the statistics. The subset of Muslims being reported about (44% of the total terrorism coverage by the media) that are foreign-born Muslim were was 32%. There were no conclusions as to whether or not those Muslims that make up the current population of the united states were responsible. I suggest you go read the study before making false conclusions."
"There were more deaths in western countries from the period 2006 to 2014 that were Islam related compared to all other religions and supremacist groups combined. Global Terrorism Index 2015 pg 57"
So if I'm getting this right; presuming these are accurate and not just trash-information, and of course youtube commenters are always the best source of info......66% of all terrorists acts are committed by muslim's. 32% of all terrorists acts are committed by foreign-born muslims, Muslims' committed more terrorists acts from 200-6-2014 combined. And the Young Turk's purposefully conflated things like "vandalism and property damage" kind of crimes to try and up the numbers of non-muslim Terrorism to try and make the Muslim-Terrorists look better.
Well i am not sure i can trust that youtube commenter on the statsitc
because if you were to scroll down i bet you get
"Why arent you guys talking about pizzagate"
So if they see the statics I would have to see that. But note that would work for muslim attacker as well. Simply vandalis..or ones that failed and resulted in no deaths
How does it compare to reports on Anglo-Terrorists attacks?
I mean; if your 5000% over-represented for terrorists attacks......
Or to put it this way; as compared to the amount of terrorists attacks they make, are they 13x over-represented for that?
i dont know did you look at the clip. I ask because they did break it down into demographics
because if mean white dudes. From the attacks they actully make a good chunk of the attacks if you include shit like attacking abortions clincs and stuff. Least according to the study in that clip
Dont know if mass shootings included in that. if that consider a terroist attack or just being a crazy asshole
The Young Turks needs to learn the concept of proportionality.
If Muslims make up about 1% of the US adult population, and are committing approximately 13% of terror attacks... That's noteworthy.
It might actually be worse than that; it seemed like that was the statistic for "foreign-born" muslim terrorists.
So maybe better for native born but absolutely poor showing for them considering that I working under the assumption most muslims in the US are born here.
No it was for BOTH
native, 12 percent
Foreign born is 5 percent
Your right; the 1 in 3 million was "all" terrorist attacks from foreign-born terrorists.
So wait; 17 percent of terrorist attacks are muslim or out of every 12 attacks 5 will be foreign born?
i ASSUME their seperated