Herochat

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - NeoGreenLantern

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 1085
31
ICT / Re: Cap marvel vs Thor
« on: March 13, 2019, 05:21:13 PM »
I think you guys are confused.

Stormbreaker itself had inherit power and it amplifies his own. He threw it through the IG blast and lodged it in Thanos’ chest. That was not a durability feat for the hammer. It is connected with the bifrost and has pew pew of its own. It clearly amplifies Thor’s power.

Do you simply think he needed a more durable weapon? It has inherit power and amps his own power. It was a charged hammer throw=energy projection. They had entire scenes dedicated to the “power of the Weapon”.

2 steps forward and 3 steps back with this place. Fundamental gaps of knowledge

I'm not denying any of that. I'm saying she was shown to dump larger amounts of her energy than Thor and Stormbreaker did. The stormbreaker attack on Thanos was not just an energy attack.

What Neo said. Hell, Thor hit Thanos with a lightning strike that did nothing to him. If SB is greater than the IG and adds to Thor's lightning attacks, then that blast should've done some sort of visible damage, right? Yet Thanos popped right back up like it was nothing.

Thor’s lightning strike knocked Thanos down and dragged him through the ground.  It's not like it bounced off his chest.

I am still wondering why people see Carol’s energy as superior.  Blowing up missiles is very much Thor's forte'.

She was also tearing through Kree ships cannonball style.

Thor also tore through the big drop ships in Infinity War in the exact same way.

https://youtu.be/nfopLOkNres?t=230

My point is, and it's realize this is super nitpicky, is that for her to do that she has to generate an energy field to do it. It's like the difference between Green Lantern and Superman.

32
ICT / Re: Cap marvel vs Thor
« on: March 13, 2019, 04:11:47 PM »
I think you guys are confused.

Stormbreaker itself had inherit power and it amplifies his own. He threw it through the IG blast and lodged it in Thanos’ chest. That was not a durability feat for the hammer. It is connected with the bifrost and has pew pew of its own. It clearly amplifies Thor’s power.

Do you simply think he needed a more durable weapon? It has inherit power and amps his own power. It was a charged hammer throw=energy projection. They had entire scenes dedicated to the “power of the Weapon”.

2 steps forward and 3 steps back with this place. Fundamental gaps of knowledge

I'm not denying any of that. I'm saying she was shown to dump larger amounts of her energy than Thor and Stormbreaker did. The stormbreaker attack on Thanos was not just an energy attack.

What Neo said. Hell, Thor hit Thanos with a lightning strike that did nothing to him. If SB is greater than the IG and adds to Thor's lightning attacks, then that blast should've done some sort of visible damage, right? Yet Thanos popped right back up like it was nothing.

Thor’s lightning strike knocked Thanos down and dragged him through the ground.  It's not like it bounced off his chest.

I am still wondering why people see Carol’s energy as superior.  Blowing up missiles is very much Thor's forte'.

She was also tearing through Kree ships cannonball style.

33
Thats cool.
They need more of that in the comics. Him in the AVENGERS book is the worst part of reading that for me.
Anyway, my point was, never have i said i hated the movie!

Did you watch Civil War? His PB persona is closer to how he is at the end of the movie then at the beginning.

34
Music, Movies, Tv and Books / Re: Scuzziest celebrities
« on: March 13, 2019, 03:40:18 PM »
I guess it depends on what you consider scuzzy. he's got a bit of a sex addiction but other than that he seems pretty well put together. Like I'd be seriously shocked if it came out he had like a meth addiction.

35
ICT / Re: Cap marvel vs Thor
« on: March 13, 2019, 11:38:53 AM »
You're getting energy out put and overall power mixed together. I'm not saying Stormbreaker isn't a powerful weapon that rivals the IG. It's just not a pew pew pew weapon. The pew pew pew it sends out is all Thor's power.

People will argue The Hulk is as powerful as Superman but you would be hard press to find someone to say The Hulk as the same level of energy out put seeing as one has heat vision and the closest thing Hulk can do is a thunderclap.

36
ICT / Re: Cap marvel vs Thor
« on: March 13, 2019, 10:37:25 AM »
I saw storm breaker going through the beam more of a durability feat for Stormbreaker than an energy feat for Thor.

So yeah I'd give Thor durability and strength and Carol energy out put. Probably speed too since she's a space traveler. Overall I'd say they are pretty damn close to each other. Will see what happens in End Game

37
Music, Movies, Tv and Books / Re: Scuzziest celebrities
« on: March 13, 2019, 10:12:13 AM »
I was just at Monster Mania Con in Cherry Hill and Monica Keena was there. She looked like she would give you a contact cocaine high. Also needs to lay off the lip plumping.

Fariuza Balk was also there and she's looking pretty rough but she's been looking rough for a while.

On the other end Christina Ricci, Neve Campbell, and Rachel True are all ridiculously beautiful in person.

38
So you think Trump is both the exposer and someone who will be exposed?

Kudos you just took the gold from letters in mental gymnastics.

39
Anyone else think the style is kinda Magnolia-esque

40
Please letters went out of his way to defend Trump when people showed him direct ties to Epstein.

41
ICT / Re: Cap marvel vs Thor
« on: March 12, 2019, 08:05:09 PM »
I actually think Carol might have the better energy out put but Thor is stronger. I'm trying to remember if she had any lifting feats. When she was blasting through the ships it was more of a Cannonball-esque attack.

42
I've been looking for a moment to sit at my comp and think this through. But yeah even my least favorite (Dark World) I still find enjoyable.

43
No. Not at all. This might surprise some people but most humans can pay attention to multiple things at a time. You're gonna be hearing about a lot of things once it becomes unsealed.

No, most people were flat out protecting people like this when it was pointed out years ago. Like you.

Feel free to quote me were I defended Epstein.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 1085