|
NeoGreenLantern
|
 |
« on: June 11, 2012, 10:04:20 pm » |
|
Currently about half the states in the US allow marriage between first cousins. What should we do about this? Should we be allowing this any state? Should this be something allowed in all states? Or should we just pretend this isn't going on so we don't have to think about how icky it is?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119's Poster of the Month for January 2008 and March 2010
Herochat's 2007 Award Winner for Most Improved
"Gaara of the Sands doesn't like black people."
-Kanye West
|
|
|
|
Ramz
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2012, 10:34:44 pm » |
|
lol, the similarities in genetics from cousin to cousin aren't shit. I don't think its a huge deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
safado
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2012, 11:02:14 pm » |
|
Everyone is up in arms over gay marriage and this slips right through the cracks. Genetically speaking it isn't a big deal
It's just icky, I've seen it first hand and it grossed me the fuck out
Aint no one should be picking up chicks at a family reuinion
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Atheism: The only religion dedicated to the smug worship of one's own narcissistic self
|
|
|
|
Jabroniville
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2012, 02:06:17 am » |
|
It's gross, but I'm not sure if it should be illegal. I mean, it's viewed pretty much as the grossest, redneck-iest thing in history, so social stigma alone should make people ashamed of doing it. How often does this even happen?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Maxine Hunkel = Greatest Character Ever. |
|
|
|
safado
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2012, 06:49:27 pm » |
|
Wayyyy more than you want to know
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Atheism: The only religion dedicated to the smug worship of one's own narcissistic self
|
|
|
|
Tenuto
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2012, 11:11:17 pm » |
|
I agree with Jabroni. There's enough social stigma against it to at least keep it out of view, and the genetic aspect of cousin-breeding isn't that big of a deal (?). Soooo no I wouldn't make it illegal. I'd just shun them. Like furries.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2012, 12:36:58 pm » |
|
Certainly, anyone who is for homosexual 'marriage' has nothing to say about incestuous adult marriages of any sort.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tenuto
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2012, 12:42:43 pm » |
|
Incestuous relationships can produce mutant freakshow babies, gay relationships produce no babies.
No babies > monster babies
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2012, 12:48:13 pm » |
|
Incestuous relationships can produce mutant freakshow babies, gay relationships produce no babies.
No babies > monster babies
More like healthy babies> genetically deficient babies>NOTHING. Lord knows half the posters from the south wouldn't exist if not for cousin fucking. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
superlurker
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2012, 06:55:44 pm » |
|
And that would be bad?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
safado
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2012, 09:33:29 pm » |
|
wonder if Strider is from the south
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Atheism: The only religion dedicated to the smug worship of one's own narcissistic self
|
|
|
|
Clock
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2012, 09:42:18 pm » |
|
wonder if Strider is from the south
We will not be having this here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Strider119
Asskicker Extraordinaire
Moderators
Guardian of the Universe
 Offline
Posts: 36956
Legolas, bro
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2012, 09:55:21 pm » |
|
wonder if Strider is from the south
You libelous piece of shit! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119 Points can be redeemed for fabulous prizes!!!
Strange: 3
Hamburglar: 3
Wyntr: 1
Ramz: 1
Fatnlazy: 1
HalloweenJack: 1
Clock: 1
Kallor: 1
Master: 1
Neo: 1
|
|
|
Strider119
Asskicker Extraordinaire
Moderators
Guardian of the Universe
Offline
Posts: 36956
Legolas, bro
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2012, 09:55:42 pm » |
|
Currently about half the states in the US allow marriage between first cousins. What should we do about this? Should we be allowing this any state? Should this be something allowed in all states? Or should we just pretend this isn't going on so we don't have to think about how icky it is?
On topic, whatever. I got some hot cousins. Mmmmmm. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119 Points can be redeemed for fabulous prizes!!!
Strange: 3
Hamburglar: 3
Wyntr: 1
Ramz: 1
Fatnlazy: 1
HalloweenJack: 1
Clock: 1
Kallor: 1
Master: 1
Neo: 1
|
|
|
Master
Definitely not Master505.
Moderators
The Celestial
Offline
Posts: 24784
Master of Illusions
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2012, 08:18:21 pm » |
|
Not everything that is socially taboo needs to be illegal. And because this is not a pressing legal matter on the federal level, it's perfectly fine to allow the states to decide if they want to prohibit such marriage.
Definitely gross as shit though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 9 outta 10 mewling quims fear Master. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cleric
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 23, 2012, 08:32:26 pm » |
|
Eh, aren't handicapped people allowed to marry? How is that any better from fucking your hot sister?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rainbow dash
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 29, 2012, 05:09:38 am » |
|
More like healthy babies> genetically deficient babies>NOTHING.
Lord knows half the posters from the south wouldn't exist if not for cousin fucking.
I turned out fucking wonderful. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Astro
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2012, 01:30:12 pm » |
|
This should be regulated on genetic grounds much more than social ones, IMHO.
Many cousins never know or see each other, but serious genetic predispositions can and do exist across cousins that lead to unfortunate congenital issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2012, 01:59:33 pm » |
|
This should be regulated on genetic grounds much more than social ones, IMHO.
? So adults can't choose who to love now? left-fascist hypocrisy is always amusing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Astro
|
|
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2012, 02:19:54 pm » |
|
I don't particularly care if people do fuck or don't fuck, but I'm saying -- if you're going to make incest illegal, it should be for genetic reasons rather than the social taboo (which is where the taboo originated from in the first place).
If people want to have genetically diseased babies, I'm all for it. Freedom to choose, and that doesn't mean you love them any less.
By that same standard, brothers and sisters should be allowed to marry and procreate as well. I really am fine with that, though it brings up the issue of burdens on the state.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2012, 02:25:03 pm » |
|
So it's a viable idea in any way to you that genetically deficient individuals should not be allowed to marry?
What happens if a genetic disposition towards homosexuality is discovered?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NeoGreenLantern
|
|
« Reply #22 on: July 02, 2012, 05:26:56 pm » |
|
It becomes not an issue since to dudes or dudettes fuckin aren't gonna produce a kid anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119's Poster of the Month for January 2008 and March 2010
Herochat's 2007 Award Winner for Most Improved
"Gaara of the Sands doesn't like black people."
-Kanye West
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #23 on: July 02, 2012, 05:52:39 pm » |
|
It becomes not an issue since to dudes or dudettes fuckin aren't gonna produce a kid anyways.
What does it matter anyway? I thought according to the pro-homo marriage crowd, marriage has nothing to do with kids, right? So in the event that there is a genetic trait dicovered, it would then be conceivably viable to ban gays from conceiving genetic descendants, via tech or surrogates, right? Hell, banning people with undesirable genetic deficiencies from creating children is okay, right? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 02, 2012, 05:55:35 pm by Panthergod »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NeoGreenLantern
|
|
« Reply #24 on: July 02, 2012, 05:55:49 pm » |
|
I don't know why it matters you asked the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119's Poster of the Month for January 2008 and March 2010
Herochat's 2007 Award Winner for Most Improved
"Gaara of the Sands doesn't like black people."
-Kanye West
|
|
|
|
Tony XerxēsTWD Stark
|
|
« Reply #25 on: July 02, 2012, 05:56:15 pm » |
|
What does it matter anyway?
I thought according to the pro-homo marriage crowd, marriage has nothing to do with kids, right?
So in the event that there is a genetic trait dicovered, it would then be conceivably viable to ban gays from conceiving genetic descendants, via tech or surrogates, right?
Hell, banning people with undesirable genetic deficiencies from creating children is okay, right?
You were the one insisting marriages have to produce children. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #26 on: July 02, 2012, 05:57:30 pm » |
|
You were the one insisting marriages have to produce children.
No I wasn't. I also wasn't the one who said that marriage has nothing to do with children, whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tony XerxēsTWD Stark
|
|
« Reply #27 on: July 02, 2012, 06:00:19 pm » |
|
No I wasn't.
I also wasn't the one who said that marriage has nothing to do with children, whatsoever.
You made it clear, multiple times, that if a couple isn't producing children, they shouldn't be allowed to marry or civilization would collapse. You even tried to reinforce that view, in this thread, by saying a couple that produces deformed children is somehow superior to a couple that produces zero children. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NeoGreenLantern
|
|
« Reply #28 on: July 02, 2012, 06:02:56 pm » |
|
Hell, banning people with undesirable genetic deficiencies from creating children is okay, right?
No and no one had said that either. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119's Poster of the Month for January 2008 and March 2010
Herochat's 2007 Award Winner for Most Improved
"Gaara of the Sands doesn't like black people."
-Kanye West
|
|
|
|
Panthergod
|
|
« Reply #29 on: July 02, 2012, 06:11:46 pm » |
|
You made it clear, multiple times, that if a couple isn't producing children, they shouldn't be allowed to marry or civilization would collapse.
Flagrant lie. And you know it. You even tried to reinforce that view, in this thread, by saying a couple that produces deformed children is somehow superior to a couple that produces zero children.
Yes, sick people have valuable lives even if they are more difficult than people with optimum health. I know you must pretend that human life and the activity innately conducive to the existence of all human life is meaningless because you are eager to capitulate to the politically manipulated low-self esteem delusions of gay people due to indoctrination meant to instill enormous levels of hatred for the facts about reality that make people feel bad, but when people start stating that it is unreasonable to believe that people with genetic deficiencies have any value whatsoever, I insinuating that they might want to reevaluate their ideological premises. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NeoGreenLantern
|
|
« Reply #30 on: July 02, 2012, 06:22:44 pm » |
|
but when people start stating that it is unreasonable to believe that people with genetic deficiencies have any value whatsoever, I insinuating that they might want to reevaluate their ideological premises.
Aaaaaaaaaand no one said that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strider119's Poster of the Month for January 2008 and March 2010
Herochat's 2007 Award Winner for Most Improved
"Gaara of the Sands doesn't like black people."
-Kanye West
|
|
|
|
Tony XerxēsTWD Stark
|
|
« Reply #31 on: July 02, 2012, 06:39:26 pm » |
|
Flagrant lie.
And you know it. You've gone above and beyond the call establishing that as your viewpoint. Yes, sick people have valuable lives even if they are more difficult than people with optimum health. Haha, your desperation is growing with every thread. I deleted your 89-word run-on sentence of nothing. It didn't actually say anything relevant, but it did try to slip a clumsy insult in. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
